Pride and Prejudice v. Pride & Prejudice


Jane Austin may be rolling in her grave, but then again she may merely be “Excessively diverted”, in the latest attempt at adapting her novel. How annoyed am I at the attempt? Let me count the ways!
1. Keira Knightly as Elizabeth Bennett- “she smiles too much”! The girl can act; I’ve seen her do it in other movies. I know this is an adaptation, and there is no way to fully interpret Austin’s book in a 2 hour movie, but come on, facial expressions only go so far in conveying feeling.
2. Where is the dialog folks? Does anyone remember 1995’s Sense and Sensibility? Ang Lee directed and Emma Thompson adapted the book. This is proof that a Jane Austin book can be adapted and not dumbed down in the process. It can be done and done very well.
3. “Three very silly sisters”! Mary, Kitty, and Lydia are in the movie but their lines are few. Again not much dialog. Mary looks sober while Kitty and Lydia giggle and run around like idiots. It’s like the actors were paid to play the characters in Charades. “Quick act like Mary Bennet” One should look sober and slightly pissed off. “Quick act like Kitty or Lydia” One should skip, jump, and giggle while murmuring something about “Ewww officers”
4. Georgiana Darcy-what the hell were those people thinking? Georgiana is a painfully shy and quite girl. Georgiana would NOT, I REPEAT NOT, jump up from the piano forte (very unladylike), and run (again unladylike) to enthusiastically greet Elizabeth Bennet (hello, she is shy!). I mean if we are not going to follow the book in drawing character traits why not have King Kong march over and pick Elizabeth up. Or more (un)sensibly have a pop star playing an electric keyboard plugging her latest hit.
I am glad that people are still enthralled enough by Jane Austin to attempt adaptations. Maybe this movie will introduce Austin to a new generation, but I have advice for them. Read the book and see the 1995 BBC production of Pride and Prejudice starring Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth.